From the Daily Press: State officials say Chesapeake Bay Foundation analysis is not fair.
As the McDonnell administration criticizes the federal government’s effort to intensify Chesapeake Bay restoration, environmental advocates warn that Virginia is failing to reach early pollution reduction goals. Virginia is lacking in creating forest and grass buffers, and in controlling fertilizer runoff from urban and suburban sources, such as golf courses and manicured lawns.
For entire article, go here>>
From Delmarva Now: Chesapeake Bay swimming holes outdo toilet bowls in bacteria count.
College Park, MD - Swimming in the rivers that feed the Chesapeake Bay after a hard rain could be as hazardous to your health as hopping into an unflushed toilet. Water samples before and after significant rainfall at seven beaches and recreation spots along five rivers that feed the Chesapeake Bay. The goal was to gauge the impact of storm water — one of the fastest-growing pollution sources in the Chesapeake Bay — on bacteria levels in the water.
To plunge in to the article, go here>>
From PA Environmental Digest: EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Funds 11 Restoration Projects, Only One In Pennsylvania.
Eleven innovative environmental projects throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed will reduce an estimated 1.5 million pounds of nitrogen, 51,000 pounds of phosphorus and 20,000 pounds of sediment from entering the Bay and its local waterways with $5.8 million in grants through the Innovative Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Program. Only one of those projects, $400,000 for implementing six highly visible green infrastructure projects to reduce stormwater infiltration in the City of Lancaster, is in Pennsylvania.
For full article, go here>>
admin Chesapeake Bay Chesapeake Bay, erosion and sediment control, fertilizer, forest buffers, nutrient reduction, sediment reductions, stormwater, stormwater runoff, water quality, watershed protection